多语言
  • Index
  • News
  • Information Details
  • JAVY’s Sun Ying Recognized in LegalOne’s Remarkable Case List

    Release Time:2024-01-09

    Recently, the renowned international legal business rating agency, LegalOne, announced its annual "Outstanding Cases" (LegalOne Merits) awards. LegalOne granted the honorific evaluation of "Remarkable" to the "M Bank vs. H Company Financial Loan Contract Dispute Case" represented by Sun Ying Esq., partner at JAVY Law Firm.


    640 (23).png


    In May 2018, H Company borrowed 5.98 billion RMB from M Bank with a loan term of one year. H Company used 100% equity of a Tibetan company it owned as collateral, with a real estate development company as the guarantor, using its land and buildings as collateral.


    Subsequently, an announcement by H Company disclosed abnormal financial conditions, leading to multiple lawsuits and arbitration disputes, triggering a condition in the loan contract allowing M Bank to declare the loan due in advance. Therefore, citing financial non-compliance, M Bank filed a legal lawsuit against H Company, demanding immediate repayment of the loan principal and asking the guarantor to fulfill its obligations. The court ultimately supported M Bank's claim.


    Ms. Sun acted as the representative lawyer for M Bank in this case. H Company faced significant financial challenges, with a claim amounting to hundreds of billions of RMB. The emergency-appointed legal representative immediately initiated the case filing and asset preservation procedures. Conducting an effective control and investigation of nearly 800 million RMB worth of assets within 24 hours laid a solid foundation for the subsequent realization of the creditor's rights.


    After entering the enforcement stage, the entire property and land mortgaged by the guarantor to the bank were partially sealed by Beijing Fourth Intermediate People's Court, with the remaining portion sealed by Beijing Second Intermediate People's Court in a separate case execution. For the sake of unified execution, overall disposal of the mortgaged property, and comprehensive realization, Ms. Sun actively communicated and coordinated with the two courts.


    Ultimately, with joint efforts from Ms. Sun’s team and the Beijing High People's Court, a portion of the mortgaged property detained by Beijing Second Intermediate People's Court was transferred for unified execution auction by Beijing Fourth Intermediate People's Court and executed by the court. The case concluded in April 2020, prioritizing payment from the auction proceeds of the mortgaged items. From filing to the overall disposal of mortgaged assets, the creditor's rights were realized in less than two years. The case resulted in a final victory, with M Bank successfully recovering its funds.


    Through the efforts of Ms. Sun’s team, coordinated guidance from the Beijing High Court, and overall execution by Beijing Fourth Intermediate People's Court, the case was efficiently and swiftly concluded in the most straightforward manner, significantly saving judicial costs, improving execution efficiency, safeguarding the maximum value of the assets involved, protecting creditor interests, and achieving maximal results. This case is conducive to promoting the disposal of financial debt cases and serves as a model for the collection and handling of financial compensation cases, providing a reference for the consolidated execution of similar cases.


    Relevant Persons More
    JAVY Law Firm’s Official Website Suggestion Box
    Dear Netizens,Nice to see you!:
    Welcome to the official website of JAVY Law Firm. In order to continuously improve the quality of the website and the service quality of all colleagues in JAVY Law Firm,your suggestions and comments on any aspect of our firm can be put forward here, and we will listen to you carefully. Looking forward to your valuable suggestions in your busy schedule. Your information or idea is only for research and will never be made public. Please feel free to answer.
    *Name:
    *Cellphone:
    1. Where did you get the information about JAVY Law Firm?
    2. Does the content of this website meet your needs? Are there any other suggestions?
    3. What do you think of the environment of JAVY Law Firm? Are there any other suggestions?
    4. Do you think JAVY Law Firm has convenient transportation? Are there any other suggestions?
    5. Does the current business scope of JAVY Law Firm meet your needs? Do you have any other better suggestions?
    6. How about the lawyer's services that contact you? Are there any areas for improvement?
    7. Do you think if there are any shortcomings of JAVY Law Firm? What are the specific suggestions and expectations?