多语言
  • Index
  • News
  • Information Details
  • Solicitor Liu Yang successfully represented a client in a state-owned land expropriation compensation case, securing over 30 million yuan in fair compensation.

    Release Time:2025-11-04

    Recently, solicitor Liu Yang of JAVY Law Firm successfully represented a client in a complex administrative dispute concerning compensation for the expropriation of state-owned land use rights, demonstrating exceptional professional competence and extensive case experience. By pursuing both administrative reconsideration and direct negotiations with the government, he ultimately secured over 30 million yuan in reasonable compensation for the client. This represented more than double the initial compensation proposal, effectively safeguarding the client's legitimate rights and interests.

     

    01 Case Background

     

    As an enterprise participating in a local government investment promotion project, a certain comprehensive testing company lawfully acquired the usage rights to 20,000 square metres of state-owned Grade II public welfare forest land in 2019, intending to develop a motor vehicle testing station project. During project advancement, the company completed preliminary preparatory work including geological surveys and design, investing substantial human, material, and financial resources. However, the local Railway Office and Natural Resources Bureau abruptly issued land use control notices prohibiting construction. Furthermore, a government project had occupied 500 square metres of the company's land without compensation and without prior consultation. The government initially offered only approximately 10 million yuan in compensation. Feeling its rights had been infringed, the company resolved to pursue legal avenues to safeguard its legitimate interests.

     

    02 Lawyer's Intervention: Key Victory in Administrative Review

     

    Upon accepting the mandate, solicitor Liu Yang promptly assembled a specialised legal team to conduct a comprehensive and meticulous review and analysis of the case. Through in-depth research and evidence gathering, the team swiftly identified clear violations by the government in the expropriation procedures and compensation standards. Based on these illegalities, solicitor Liu decided to first file an administrative review application with the relevant authority to rectify the government's unlawful actions and lay the groundwork for securing reasonable compensation.

     

    Throughout the administrative review process, Attorney Liu, drawing upon his robust legal expertise and extensive practical experience, vigorously argued the case, thoroughly articulating the procedural and compensatory deficiencies in the government's expropriation actions. Following rigorous argumentation and repeated debate, the administrative review body ultimately accepted Attorney Liu's principal arguments. It determined that the government's expropriation actions were procedurally unlawful and involved unfair compensation, ordering the government to re-examine the compensation matters. This successful administrative review outcome established a crucial foundation for subsequent negotiations with the government, giving the client hope for securing reasonable compensation.

     

    03 Multiple Rounds of Negotiation: Securing Full Compensation Through Settlement

     

    Following the successful administrative review, the legal team promptly initiated negotiations with the local government. Throughout these discussions, the team adhered steadfastly to the principle of ‘grounding arguments in facts and upholding legal standards,’ insisting that an objective and impartial valuation of the land and its fixtures be conducted by a professional appraisal agency to determine the compensation amount.

     

    Through persistent advocacy, the local government ultimately agreed to commission a third-party professional appraisal agency to assess the disputed land. The appraisal revealed the market value of the land and its surface structures exceeded 30 million yuan. Following relentless efforts, both parties reached a settlement agreement whereby the government agreed to pay full compensation based on the appraised value, thereby recovering substantial financial losses for the client.

     

    The successful representation in this case not only provides valuable experience for resolving similar administrative disputes but also fully demonstrates Jialu Law Firm's professional capability and strength in handling complex administrative disputes. Moving forward, Jialu Law Firm will continue to uphold its service philosophy of ‘client-centricity and law as our weapon’, continuously enhancing its professional standards and service quality to provide more clients with high-quality, efficient legal services. This will help resolve various administrative disputes and uphold social fairness and justice.


    Relevant Persons More
    JAVY Law Firm’s Official Website Suggestion Box
    Dear Netizens,Nice to see you!:
    Welcome to the official website of JAVY Law Firm. In order to continuously improve the quality of the website and the service quality of all colleagues in JAVY Law Firm,your suggestions and comments on any aspect of our firm can be put forward here, and we will listen to you carefully. Looking forward to your valuable suggestions in your busy schedule. Your information or idea is only for research and will never be made public. Please feel free to answer.
    *Name:
    *Cellphone:
    1. Where did you get the information about JAVY Law Firm?
    2. Does the content of this website meet your needs? Are there any other suggestions?
    3. What do you think of the environment of JAVY Law Firm? Are there any other suggestions?
    4. Do you think JAVY Law Firm has convenient transportation? Are there any other suggestions?
    5. Does the current business scope of JAVY Law Firm meet your needs? Do you have any other better suggestions?
    6. How about the lawyer's services that contact you? Are there any areas for improvement?
    7. Do you think if there are any shortcomings of JAVY Law Firm? What are the specific suggestions and expectations?