News

Recently, Tang Jinming of JAVY Law Firm, with his profound legal literacy, meticulous logical thinking and excellent defense ability, successfully obtained full support from the court for the agent company in the second trial in a complex contract dispute case, and revoked the first trial judgment and rejected all the other party's litigation requests.
Scroll down to view all content

This case involved a contract dispute in which the plaintiff, a company B (hereinafter referred to as “Company B”), sued Company A for defaulting on printing costs. In the first trial, Company B claimed that Company A had failed to pay the relevant amount and demanded that Company A be held liable for payment. However, Company A raised a defense, claiming that the debt between the two parties had been transferred to a third party, Company C (hereinafter referred to as “Company C”), through the Claims and Debts Transfer Agreement, and that Company C had partially fulfilled its payment obligations. The Court of First Instance did not accept Company A's defense and ruled that Company A should pay for the printing costs.
Facing the unfavorable judgment of the first instance, Company A chose to appeal and appointed Mr. Tang Jinming as its litigation agent. After accepting the commission, Tang immediately conducted a comprehensive and detailed analysis of the case, and found the key point of the case: company B's business personnel in the signing of the “statement”, although stamped with the business seal, but did not carefully read the content of the transfer of debt, and the transfer of debt between the company A and company C is true and effective agreement.
In order to prove the authenticity and validity of the debt transfer, he actively retrieved relevant evidence, including the Debt Transfer Agreement, the Statement and the WeChat chat records between the two parties. During the second trial, Mr. Tang strongly refuted Company B's claim. He emphasized that the transfer of debt is the result of the true meaning of both parties, and has been actually performed, so company B has no right to claim against company A again. In the end, the court adopted Mr. Tang's defense, reversed the judgment of the first instance, and rejected all of Company B's claims.
This victory not only saved Company B's economic loss, but also demonstrated Mr. Tang's outstanding professional ability and excellent defense skills. In the future, JAVY Law Firm will continue to provide professional and efficient quality legal services for more enterprises and clients, and contribute more wisdom and strength to the harmonious stability and prosperous development of the society.