多语言
  • 首页
  • 要闻资讯
  • 资讯详情
  • 嘉潍研究 | Shandong Court Recognizes HERMÈS as Well-Known Trademark

    发布时间:2024-03-07

    2550adb1169fdf256fdbccabfaac905bb9842aca123a9-FwKtwW_fw1200webp.jpg

    The Shandong High Court has made a significant ruling [(2022) Lu Min Zhong No. 2582] reaffirming the well-known status of Hermès International’s trademark registrations: Registration No. 1708652 for HERMÈS and Registration No. 1636601 for HERMÈS in Chinese in Class 18.


    As a result of the judgment on February 1, 2023, Hermès International was awarded RMB 2 million (around USD 281,700) in damages. The decision was announced in November 2023.


    Shandong Hu Gang Jian Ye Real Estate Development Co., Ltd. (Hu Gang Jian Ye Company), a Chinese company, used the name “Hermès Themed Apartments” for its residential buildings. It also prominently and extensively used the HERMÈS logo in various mediums, including on protective building nets, billboards, electronic screens, and promotional materials; and including on online platforms such as WeChat and online media reports.


    The first instance court, the Shandong Province Tsingtao Intermediate People’s Court [(2021) Lu 02 Min Chu No. 1856] found that Hu Gang Jian Ye Company knowingly used the HERMÈS logos in commercial activities related to the construction, sales, exhibition, and advertising of the residential properties.


    The court determined that:


    The logos used by Hu Gang Jian Ye Company were identical to Hermès International’s registered trademarks, which had achieved widespread recognition and well-known status in China;


    The public was likely to associate these logos with Hermès International and its brand;


    By using the infringing logos, Hu Gang Jian Ye Company misled the public into believing a connection or authorization from Hermès International, leading to confusion and dilution of the distinctiveness of the well-known HERMÈS trademarks.


    It concluded that Hu Gang Jian Ye Company’s use of the logos infringed upon Hermès International’s trademark rights.


    The court also noted that Hu Gang Jian Ye Company intentionally merged its Hermès Themed Apartments with the HERMÈS brand, creating a misleading association in consumers’ minds. The company also marketed the apartments as luxury goods, further strengthening the connection with Hermès International’s renowned luxury brand.


    The court deemed these promotional activities misleading and constituting unfair competition, adding that whether the HERMÈS products displayed in the alleged infringer’s sales center and sample rooms were authentic or not did not change the finding that the consumers are likely to be misled into associating the Hermès Themed Apartments with Hermès International and its brand.


    However, according to the first instance court’s observation, Hermès International became aware of the alleged infringement no later than November 26, 2019, but it failed to promptly notify or warn Hu Gang Jian Ye Company to cease the infringement. It was not until August 2021 that Hermès International directly filed a lawsuit, thus neglecting to exercise its legal rights. Consequently, Hermès International should also bear corresponding responsibility for the expanded portion of the losses incurred as a result of Hu Gang Jian Ye Company’s infringement.


    Finally, the Shandong Higher Court dismissed Hu Gang Jian Ye Company’s appeal, and the first instance judgment was upheld.


    JAVY


    Disclaimer:

    Although every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of this article, readers are urged to check independently on matters of specific concern or interest. Law & Research updates are published without comment from Javy Law Firm except where it has taken an official position.




    嘉潍律师事务所官网意见箱
    尊敬的网友,您好:
    欢迎登陆嘉潍律师事务所官方网站。为了不断提高网站品质以及嘉潍律师事务所全体同仁的服务质量,您对我所任何方面的建议与意见均可在此提出,我们会认真聆听。期盼您在百忙之中留下宝贵建议。您的资料仅供研究参考,绝不公开,请您放心回答。
    *姓名:
    *手机号:
    1、您是从何处得知嘉潍律师事务所信息的?
    2、本网站内容是否满足您的需求?是否有其他建议?
    3、您认为嘉潍律师事务所环境如何?是否有其他建议?
    4、您认为嘉潍律师事务所交通是否便利?是否有其他建议?
    5、目前嘉潍律师事务所的业务范围是否满足您的需求?您有哪些更好的建议?
    6、与您联系对接的律师服务如何?是否有需要改进的地方?
    7、您认为嘉潍律师事务所不足之处有哪些?还有哪些具体的建议与期望?