News

Recently, JIA LAWYER law firm Liu Rui lawyers, Di Kunpeng lawyers acting on behalf of a case of manslaughter, after unremitting efforts, the success of the parties to the decision not to prosecute, and effectively safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, highlighting the JIA LAWYER's professionalism and responsibility to bear.

1、Lawyers actively intervene, defend rights and interests with all their might

On May 21, 2024, the client was criminally detained by Laiyuan County Public Security Bureau for the crime of causing death by negligence.

After the occurrence of the case, the family entrusted Liu Rui and Di Kunpeng to represent the case. After accepting the commission, the two lawyers act quickly, the first time to the detention center to meet the client, detailed understanding of the case. Subsequently, the lawyers actively communicate with the public security investigating authorities, submitted the application for release on bail pending trial, and at the same time to the procuratorial organs submitted a recommendation not to arrest the legal opinion.

After two lawyers' professional analysis and reasoning, the public security and procuratorial authorities adopted the relevant legal advice, decided not to approve the arrest of the client and change the compulsory measures to bail pending trial. Since then, the two lawyers always pay close attention to the progress of the case, do not miss any detail that may affect the direction of the case. 2025 June 3, the case was transferred to the procuratorate for examination and prosecution, the two lawyers first time to read the file, in-depth analysis of the case evidence and the legal application of the problem, and wrote a detailed recommendation of the legal opinion of not prosecuting. In order to fully elaborate the point of view, the two lawyers went to the procuratorate several times to communicate with the organizing prosecutor.

2、Precise analysis of the evidence, listing the key legal opinion

Due to the wide range of this case, the social impact of the prosecutor is very cautious, specially organized a prosecutorial hearing, invited the court senior prosecutor, two investigators, people's supervisors and other people to participate.

In the hearing, the two lawyers with solid professional knowledge and full argumentation, pointed out that the key evidence in this case - the cause and effect of death appraisal report there are problems. In the legal opinion of not prosecuting, the lawyers listed four reasons, fully argued that the report can not be used as evidence, successfully overturned the key evidence on which the investigating authorities relied to determine the case.

 The two lawyers studied the case materials in depth, focusing on the key evidence - death causation appraisal report, in the non-prosecution of the legal opinion listed four reasons, arguing that the report can not be used as evidence:

Appraisal procedure is illegal: the appraisal agency acceptance is not strictly review and registration of the material sent for examination, the collection of physical evidence and samples without witness signature, the authenticity and integrity of the evidence is doubtful.

Appraisal method is not scientific: the method used is not industry common or widely recognized, and there is no scientific proof of verification, analysis of causality lack of rigorous logic and scientific basis, the conclusion of the strong subjectivity.

Identification qualification is doubtful: some appraisers do not have the relevant complex causality identification qualification and experience, the identification of the key areas of the identification of the organization's business scope of ambiguity, it is difficult to ensure that the identification conclusions are accurate and reliable.

Contradictions in the report: the report describes the injuries of the deceased and the scene investigation transcripts, witness testimony contradictions, such as the location of the deceased and the presumption of force is inconsistent with the situation, reducing the credibility of the report.

The Procuratorate finally decided not to prosecute the person concerned and to return the seized items in accordance with the law, after public hearings and prudent adoption of the lawyer's opinion. The case drew a successful conclusion, and the client and his family were highly satisfied with the result and the lawyer's work.

The successful representation of this case not only reflects the professional strength of JIA LAWYER in the field of criminal defense, but also shows the attitude of the lawyer team to be serious and responsible for each case and go all out. In the future, JAVY law firm will continue to uphold the spirit of professionalism and responsibility to provide quality and efficient legal services for more clients.